BNSF Railway Company v. Su

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/11/17: Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to not later than February 5, 2018. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General PETER H. CHANG, State Bar No. 241467 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Ave., Ste. 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 703-5939 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Peter.Chang@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Julie Su, California Labor Commissioner 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, 2:17-CV-02302-MCE-CKD 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. 17 18 19 JULIE SU, in her official capacity as LABOR COMMISSIONER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT, Complaint Served: Nov. 14, 2017 Current Response Date: Jan. 2, 2018 Requested Response Date: Feb. 5, 2018 Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Action Filed: Nov. 1, 2017 20 21 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT DEFENDANT. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Company (2:17-CV-02302-MCE-CKD) 1 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 144(a), Defendant Julie Su and Plaintiff BNSF Railway 2 Company respectfully requests that Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint (Dkt No. 1) 3 be extended to and including February 5, 2018. 4 5 Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company and Defendant Julie Su, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief on October 31, 2017, and served the same on November 14, 2017; 8 9 WHEREAS, the parties first stipulated to a 28-day extension on December 4, 2017, which extended the time to respond to January 2, 2018 (Dkt. No. 7); 10 11 WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel for Defendant requires additional time to evaluate the case and prepare a response; 12 13 WHEREAS, due to the upcoming holidays and the workload of Defendant’s undersigned counsel, the parties believe that a further extension to February 5, 2018 is appropriate; 14 15 WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint should be extended to and including February 5, 2018; 16 17 THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 144(a), and in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that 18 DEFENDANT’S deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint for 19 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Dkt. No. 1) shall be extended to and including February 5, 20 2018. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Company (2:17-CV-02302-MCE-CKD) 1 Dated: December 6, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 2 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 4 /s/ Peter H. Chang 5 PETER H. CHANG Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Julie Su, California Labor Commissioner 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: December 6, 2017 JONES DAY 12 /s/ Amanda C. Sommerfeld (as authorized on Dec. 4, 2017) 13 14 AMANDA C. SOMMERFELD Attorneys for Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER Having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, Defendant’s 20 deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to not later 21 than February 5, 2018. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 11, 2017 24 25 26 27 28 2 Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Company (2:17-CV-02302-MCE-CKD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?