Dunsmore v. Thomas
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/25/23 ADOPTING in full 32 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is REFERRED BACK to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DARRYL DUNSMORE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-02355 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
M. THOMAS,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis is represented by counsel. He has
17
18
filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a
19
United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 11, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 32. Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations issued August 11, 2023 (ECF No. 32), are
5
ADOPTED in full;
6
2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 25) is DENIED, and
7
3. The matter is REFERRED BACK to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings.
8
DATED: September 25, 2023.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?