Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/3/19 AWARDING Plaintiff Attorney fees under EAJA, in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00). (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 4 LANGLEY KREUZE, SBN: 254739 Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP 42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400 Stockton, California 95202 Telephone: (209) 948-9384 Facsimile: (209) 948-0706 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 10 LISA EDNA JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02359-CKD NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 15 16 Defendant 17 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00). This 21 22 23 24 25 26 amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412. After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the 27 28 assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under 1 the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees 2 and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 4 5 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the 6 payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Shellie Lott, pursuant to the 7 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. 8 9 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 10 11 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 12 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to 13 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security 15 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 16 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 Dated: May 3, 2019 20 /s/ Langley Kreuze LANGLEY KREUZE Attorney for Plaintiff 21 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH L. STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: May 3, 2019 /s/ Jeffrey Chen (As authorized via email on 5/1/19) JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant United States Attorney 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 6 7 8 LISA EDNA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 9 10 vs. 11 NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 12 13 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02359-CKD ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Defendant 14 15 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney fees 16 under EAJA, in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00), are 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 awarded to Plaintiff, subject to the terms of the stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2019 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?