Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/3/19 AWARDING Plaintiff Attorney fees under EAJA, in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00). (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
4
LANGLEY KREUZE, SBN: 254739
Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP
42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: (209) 948-9384
Facsimile: (209) 948-0706
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
LISA EDNA JOHNSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02359-CKD
NANCY A BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
15
16
Defendant
17
18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the
EAJA in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00). This
21
22
23
24
25
26
amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by
counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government
will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's
attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the
27
28
assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under
1
the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees
2
and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
3
Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
4
5
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the
6
payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Shellie Lott, pursuant to the
7
assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.
8
9
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA
attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
10
11
Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release
12
from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to
13
EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.
14
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security
15
Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: May 3, 2019
20
/s/ Langley Kreuze
LANGLEY KREUZE
Attorney for Plaintiff
21
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH L. STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Date: May 3, 2019
/s/ Jeffrey Chen
(As authorized via email on 5/1/19)
JEFFREY CHEN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
6
7
8
LISA EDNA JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
9
10
vs.
11
NANCY A BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
12
13
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02359-CKD
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR THE
AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
Defendant
14
15
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney fees
16
under EAJA, in the amount of SEVEN-THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED dollars ($7,200.00), are
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
awarded to Plaintiff, subject to the terms of the stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 3, 2019
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?