Thomas v. Superior Court of California, Imperial County
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/19/2018 DENYING 12 Motion to vacate or set aside judgment. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALDEN A. THOMAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-2408 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
IMPERIAL COUNTY,
Defendant.
16
17
On February 21, 2018,1 plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a request for
18
relief from a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. EFC No. 12. He seeks
19
relief from the District Court’s judgment entered on January 5, 2018. EFC Nos. 7, 8.
20
“Rule 60(b) enumerates specific circumstances in which a party may be relieved of the
21
effect of a judgment, such as mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, and the like. The Rule
22
concludes with a catchall category—subdivision (b)(6)—providing that a court may lift a
23
judgment for ‘any other reason that justifies relief.’ Relief is available under subdivision (b)(6),
24
however, only in ‘extraordinary circumstances.’” Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 771-72 (2017).
25
In his motion, plaintiff asserts that this court should grant relief from judgment entered in
26
27
28
plain error and refers to his filed objections (EFC No. 6). EFC No. 12. He then reiterates the
1
Since plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se, he is afforded the benefit of the prison mailbox
rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
1
1
arguments he made in his objections (EFC No. 12), which have already been considered by the
2
court (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff’s request for relief will therefore be denied because he has failed to
3
demonstrate any mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud as required by Federal Rule of
4
Civil Procedure 60(b).
5
6
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to vacate or set aside
judgement (ECF No. 12) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2018
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?