(PS) Gifford v. Kampa et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/11/2019 DIRECTING the clerk to issue process. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the summons by indicating the addresses of the named defendants and shall submit to the United States Marshal the required documents. Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a notice indicating that the documents described above have been submitted to the United States Marshal, or a notice that plaintiff intends to serve the summons and complaint without assistance from the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than (60) days from the date of this order. (cc: USM) (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROGER GIFFORD,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-CV-2421-TLN-DMC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

PETER KAMPA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

17
18

court is plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1).
The court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who have been

19
20

granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this screening

21

provision, the court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious;

22

(2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a

23

defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A), (B). Moreover,

24

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), this court must dismiss an action if the court

25

determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Because plaintiff has been granted leave to

26

proceed in forma pauperis, the court will screen the complaint pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). Pursuant

27

to Rule 12(h)(3), the court will also consider as a threshold matter whether it has subject-matter

28

jurisdiction.
1

1

Plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) Peter Kampa; (2) Robert Puckett,

2

Sr.; (3) Patricia Slote; (4) Melissa Tulledo; (5) Robert Winston; (6) Julie Bowles; (7) Clint

3

Dingman; (8) Ernest Goff; (9) Kevin Dixon; (10) Hornbrook Community Services District;

4

(11) Hornbrook Community Bible Church, Inc.; (12) Steven Crittenden; (13) Duke Martin; and

5

(14) Makes Soares. Plaintiff alleges violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act, Fair Labor

6

Standards Act, the Clean Water Act, the Civil Rights Act, and various state laws arising from

7

corruption and graft on the part of defendants, most of whom are board members of the

8

Hornbrook Community Services District.
The court concludes that it has subject matter jurisdiction based on plaintiff’s

9
10

allegations of violations of federal law and that the complaint appears appropriate for service by

11

the United States Marshal without pre-payment of costs. If plaintiff desires service of process by

12

the United States Marshal without pre-payment of costs, plaintiff must comply with the

13

requirements outlined below. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order, or

14

otherwise effect service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, may result in dismissal of

15

the action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local

16

Rule 110.

17

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

18

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall issue a summons in a civil case, the

19

undersigned’s new case documents, and an order setting this matter for an initial scheduling

20

conference;

21
22
23

2.

The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff the summons, fourteen (14)

USM-285 forms, and a copy of the complaint;
3.

Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

24

summons by indicating the addresses of the named defendants and shall submit to the United

25

States Marshal at the address indicated below the following documents:

26
27
28

a.
b.
c.
d.

The completed summons;
One completed USM-285 form for each named defendant;
Fifteen (15) copies of the complaint; and
Fourteen (14) copies of the court’s initial scheduling conference
order issued herewith;
2

1

4.

Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a notice

2

indicating that the documents described above have been submitted to the United States Marshal,

3

or a notice that plaintiff intends to serve the summons and complaint without assistance from the

4

United States Marshal;

5

5.

If plaintiff seeks the assistance of the United States Marshal, the United

6

States Marshal is directed to serve all process without pre-payment of costs not later than 60 days

7

from the date of this order, such service of process to be completed by serving a copy of the

8

summons, complaint, and initial scheduling conference order on the defendants at the addresses

9

provided by plaintiff; and

10
11

6.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the

United States Marshal at 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814.

12
13
14

Dated: February 11, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3