(PS) Gifford v. Kampa et al
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/10/2019 ORDERING #24 , #25 Motions to Dismiss and #26 Motion for Order requiring plaintiff to post security submitted on the briefs without oral argument. The hearing in this matter set for 9/11/2019, shall be limited to arguments related to #25 Motion to Strike. (Huang, H) Modified on 9/11/2019 (Huang, H).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROGER GIFFORD,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-2421-TLN-DMC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
PETER KAMPA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the
18
court are defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24 and 25) and defendants Winston’s
19
motions to strike (ECF No. 25) and for an order requiring plaintiff to post security (ECF No. 26).
20
All motions are set for hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 11,
21
2019, at 10:00 a.m.
22
On August 19, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement waiving oral argument on all
23
motions except defendant Winston’s motion to strike. Because such motions have been fully
24
briefed and because plaintiff has waived the opportunity to challenge the motions to dismiss and
25
motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security at the hearing, the court finds oral
26
argument on such motions unnecessary. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule
27
230(g), defendants’ motions to dismiss and defendant Winston’s motion for an order requiring
28
plaintiff to post security are, therefore, submitted on the briefs without oral argument. The
1
1
hearing in this matter set for September 11, 2019, shall be limited to arguments related to
2
defendant Winston’s motion to strike.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: September 10, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?