William H. Baymiller v. People of the State of California
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/24/18 ORDERING that The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/29/18 16 are ADOPTED in full; Petitioner's Motion to Stay 13 is GRANTED. This action is ADMINISTRATIVELY STAYED; and Petitioner is ORDERED to inform the court within thirty days of the exhaustion in state court of the unexhausted claim raised in the original petition. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM HOLT BAYMILLER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 17-cv-2458 MCE KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
19
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
20
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On June 29, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
22
contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within
23
fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2018, are adopted in full.
28
2. Petitioner’s motion to stay (ECF No 13) is granted.
1
1
3. This action is administratively stayed; and petitioner is ordered to inform the court
2
within thirty days of the exhaustion in state court of the unexhausted claim raised in the original
3
petition.
4
Dated: August 24, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?