Sekona v. Horowitz et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/10/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 5/15/19, in full; DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against defendants Joe A. Lizarraga, Medical Receiver, and C.C. Healthcare Services; and DIRECTING the Clerk to terminate Joe A. Lizarraga, Medical Receiver, and C.C. Healthcare Services as defendants to this action. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-CV-2479-JAM-DMC-P v. ORDER E. HOROWITZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On May 15, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2019, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Joe A. Lizarraga, Medical Receiver, 4 5 6 and C.C. Healthcare Services are dismissed; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Joe A. Lizarraga, Medical Receiver, and C.C. Healthcare Services as defendants to this action. 7 8 9 Dated: July 10, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?