Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/1/19 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations, GRANTING IN PART 29 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in the total amount of $17,344.73 pursuant to the EAJA. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN D. HICKS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-02480-TLN-KJN v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 On June 20, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 36), 18 19 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 36) are ADOPTED. 1 1 2 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs and expenses under the EAJA (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED IN PART. 3. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees and costs and expenses in the total amount of 4 $17,344.73 pursuant to the EAJA. If the Government determines that Plaintiff does 5 not owe a federal debt that qualifies for offset, payment is permitted in the name of 6 7 Plaintiff’s attorney. Dated: August 1, 2019 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?