Sekona v. Brandley, et al.

Filing 2

ORDER transferring case to Sacramento Division signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/27/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 13 14 15 1:17-cv-01543 EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. BRANDLEY, et al, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. ' 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The 19 alleged violations took place in Amador County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the 20 21 22 23 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action 24 will be transferred to the Sacramento Division 25 26 27 28 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be 1 1 filed at: 2 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: November 27, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?