Hougland v. Kernan
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/29/22 RESOLVING 19 Request for status update. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER HOUGLAND,
12
No. 2:17-cv-2497 WBS AC P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel and in forma pauperis, filed an
18
application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to
19
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
Petitioner has filed a request for a status update in this case. ECF No. 19. The court
21
confirms that the case has been fully briefed and is submitted for decision. The disposition of
22
habeas matters is frequently delayed in this court due to heavy caseloads and a shortage of
23
jurists.1
24
////
25
1
26
27
28
The Eastern District of California carries one of the largest and most heavily weighted
caseloads in the nation. See Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, Eastern District of
California, 2021 Annual Report, “Workload Statistics,” p. 19 (2021) (“[O]ur weighted caseload
far exceeds the national average . . . ranking us ninth in the nation and first in the Ninth Circuit.”).
This problem is dramatically compounded by the need for additional judgeships commensurate
with the caseloads and population of the district. See id.
1
1
2
3
The parties are informed that the matter is currently under review. A dispositive order
will issue in due course.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall update the docket
4
to reflect that petitioner’s request for a status update in this matter (ECF No. 19) has been
5
addressed by the court.
6
DATED: March 29, 2022
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?