Soto v. Spearman

Filing 12

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/10/18 DENYING 10 Motion for Extension as moot and DENYING 11 Motion for Reconsideration. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN SOTO, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-02498-TLN-AC Petitioner, v. ORDER M.E. SPEARMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On September 21, 2018, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations of the 18 magistrate judge assigned to this action, and judgment was entered. (See ECF Nos. 8, 9.) On the 19 same day, Petitioner filed a motion for a twenty-day extension of time to file objections to the 20 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 10.) The extension request offered illness, lack of 21 access to the prison law library, and untimely legal mail delivery in support of a grant of it. (ECF 22 No. 10 at 2.) 23 On October 5, 2018, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order. 24 (ECF No. 11.) The motion again requested an extension of time for the same reasons proffered in 25 Petitioner’s extension of time request, and it provided documents in support of the extension 26 request. (ECF No. 11.) It did not, however, provide new or different facts or circumstances that 27 did not exist or were not shown upon the prior motion. See Local Rules 230(j)(3) (E.D. Cal. 28 2009). Moreover, the petition seeks a remedy for the denial of Petitioner’s parole, which is not 1 1 actionable in habeas. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219 (2011) (federal habeas 2 jurisdiction does not extend to review of the basis for state parole decisions). For these reasons, 3 the Court will deny Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as moot, and 6 2. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 11) is DENIED. 7 8 Dated: December 10, 2018 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?