Soto v. Spearman
Filing
12
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/10/18 DENYING 10 Motion for Extension as moot and DENYING 11 Motion for Reconsideration. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARTIN SOTO,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-02498-TLN-AC
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
M.E. SPEARMAN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
On September 21, 2018, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations of the
18
magistrate judge assigned to this action, and judgment was entered. (See ECF Nos. 8, 9.) On the
19
same day, Petitioner filed a motion for a twenty-day extension of time to file objections to the
20
findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 10.) The extension request offered illness, lack of
21
access to the prison law library, and untimely legal mail delivery in support of a grant of it. (ECF
22
No. 10 at 2.)
23
On October 5, 2018, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order.
24
(ECF No. 11.) The motion again requested an extension of time for the same reasons proffered in
25
Petitioner’s extension of time request, and it provided documents in support of the extension
26
request. (ECF No. 11.) It did not, however, provide new or different facts or circumstances that
27
did not exist or were not shown upon the prior motion. See Local Rules 230(j)(3) (E.D. Cal.
28
2009). Moreover, the petition seeks a remedy for the denial of Petitioner’s parole, which is not
1
1
actionable in habeas. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219 (2011) (federal habeas
2
jurisdiction does not extend to review of the basis for state parole decisions). For these reasons,
3
the Court will deny Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as moot, and
6
2. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.
7
8
Dated: December 10, 2018
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?