Palacios vs. Smith, et al.
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/4/2019 ADOPTING 52 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 51 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JORGE PALACIOS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-02500-TLN-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
KEVIN SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Jorge Palacios, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 21, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 52.)
23
Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
24
Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
25
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
27
1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be
28
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 21, 2019 (ECF No. 52), are adopted
3
4
5
6
7
in full;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, titled
“Motion for Injunction of Temporary Restraining Order” (ECF No. 51), is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 4, 2019
8
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?