Rumantsev v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/25/18 EXTENDING plaintiff's time to file a reply brief to 10/25/2018. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 916/488-3030 916/489-9297 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff VYACHESLAV RUMANTSEV 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -o0O0o- 11 12 13 VYACHESLAV RUMANTSEV, No. 2:17-CV-02539-EFB 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner of Social Security, STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF Defendant. _______________________________________/ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a reply 23 24 brief is extended to October 25, 2018. 25 This is a second extension but of only two days, the reasons being that plaintiff’s counsel’s 26 computer and office network were being worked on for several hours on October 22, and aside 27 28 [Pleading Title] - 1 1 2 from other work, such as a hearing October 23, counsel’s schedule on October 24, 2018, is quite full. 3 4 5 Dated: October 23, 2018 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 10 11 12 13 Dated: October 23, 2018 /s/ per e-mail authorization 14 TINA NAICKER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 15 16 17 18 ORDER 19 20 21 For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of 22 23 24 25 plaintiff’s time to file a reply brief is extended to October 25, 2018. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2018. 26 27 28 [Pleading Title] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?