Clark v. Fisher

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/7/2018 VACATING 11 Motion to Proceed IFP. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed IFP is superfluous. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAKE CLARK, 11 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-2574-GEB-GGH Petitioner, v. ORDER RAYTHEL FISHER, JR., 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner is proceeding with this habeas matter pro se and in forma pauperis [“IFP”]. On 17 December 8, 2017 petitioner fie his first Motion to Proceed IFP, ECF No. 2, and that Motion was 18 granted and IFP status afforded to petitioner on December 27, 2017. ECF No. 8. On January 5, 19 2018 petitioner filed a second Motion to Proceed IFP, ECF No. 11, which is a superfluous filing 20 insofar as that status has already been granted. 21 In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed IFP dated 1/5/18 is superfluous; 23 2. The Clerk of the Court shall vacate the notification on ECF No. 11 that this motion 24 25 26 27 28 is pending. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 7, 2018 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?