Vasquez v. Frauenheim

Filing 14

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/14/2022 ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SALVADOR B. VASQUEZ,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

v.
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,

15

No. 2:17-cv-2579 KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondents.

16
17

By order filed January 6, 2022, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days,

18

why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner

19

has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this

20
21
22
23

case.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

27

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1

1

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

3

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: February 14, 2022

5
6
7
8

/vasq2579.fsc.hab

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2