Dahlin et al v. Frieborn et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/15/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall have through and including 3/9/2018 to file an amendment to their Complaint and to substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127. The time for City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta, Debby Nelson, Jon May, and Jennifer Solomon to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint and the amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be EXTENDED to not later than 21 days after the amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court. (York, M)

Download PDF
5 SERENA M. WARNER, S.B. #264799 Email: swarner@akk-law.com MELISSA T. CURRIER, S.B. #318805 Email: mcurrier@akk-law.com ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 6 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF AUBURN, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEBBY NELSON, PHILLIP ISETTA, JON MAY, and JENNIFER SOLOMON DOUGLAS R. THORN, S.B. #133521 THORN LAW FIRM 3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 300 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 768.9311 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES DAHLIN, et al. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., 17 Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 22 vs. ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT; ORDER [Local Rule 144(a)] 23 24 Douglas R. Thorn, attorney for Plaintiffs, and Serena M. Warner, counsel of record for 25 the City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta, Debby Nelson, Jon May, and 26 Jennifer Solomon, have been working cooperatively to expedite the exchange of information 27 ahead of Rule 26 Initial Disclosures in order to expedite a resolution of the case. Some of the 28 information includes the identity of Doe 126 and Doe 127, both employees of the City of Auburn -1STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 1 and Auburn Police Department who Plaintiffs intend to substitute into the case as parties. 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Mr. Thorn and Ms. Warner therefore stipulate and agree: 3 1. 4 Complaint and substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127. 5 2. 6 amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be through and including the 21st day after the 7 amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court. 8 SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Plaintiffs may have through and including March 9, 2018 to file an amendment to their The time for Ms. Warner’s clients to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and the 9 10 Dated: February 15, 2018 11 /s/ Douglas R Thorn By:_________________________________ DOUGLAS R. THORN Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES DAHLIN, et al. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 THE THORN LAW FIRM Dated: February 15, 2018 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP /s/ Serena M. Warner By:_________________________________ SERENA M. WARNER Attorneys for CITY DEFENDANTS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 1 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause having been shown, it is ordered 2 3 as follows: 4 1. 5 Complaint and to substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127. 6 2. 7 Debby Nelson, Jon May, and Jennifer Solomon to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and the 8 amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be extended to not later than 21 days after the 9 amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court. 10 11 Plaintiffs shall have through and including March 9, 2018 to file an amendment to their The time for Defendants City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 15, 2018 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?