Dahlin et al v. Frieborn et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/15/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall have through and including 3/9/2018 to file an amendment to their Complaint and to substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127. The time for City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta, Debby Nelson, Jon May, and Jennifer Solomon to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint and the amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be EXTENDED to not later than 21 days after the amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court. (York, M)
5
SERENA M. WARNER, S.B. #264799
Email: swarner@akk-law.com
MELISSA T. CURRIER, S.B. #318805
Email: mcurrier@akk-law.com
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
6
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF AUBURN, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEBBY
NELSON, PHILLIP ISETTA, JON MAY, and JENNIFER SOLOMON
DOUGLAS R. THORN, S.B. #133521
THORN LAW FIRM
3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 300
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 768.9311
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES DAHLIN, et al.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
JAMES DAHLIN, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
21
22
vs.
ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT; ORDER
[Local Rule 144(a)]
23
24
Douglas R. Thorn, attorney for Plaintiffs, and Serena M. Warner, counsel of record for
25
the City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta, Debby Nelson, Jon May, and
26
Jennifer Solomon, have been working cooperatively to expedite the exchange of information
27
ahead of Rule 26 Initial Disclosures in order to expedite a resolution of the case. Some of the
28
information includes the identity of Doe 126 and Doe 127, both employees of the City of Auburn
-1STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
1
and Auburn Police Department who Plaintiffs intend to substitute into the case as parties.
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Mr. Thorn and Ms. Warner therefore stipulate and agree:
3
1.
4
Complaint and substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127.
5
2.
6
amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be through and including the 21st day after the
7
amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court.
8
SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.
Plaintiffs may have through and including March 9, 2018 to file an amendment to their
The time for Ms. Warner’s clients to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and the
9
10
Dated: February 15, 2018
11
/s/ Douglas R Thorn
By:_________________________________
DOUGLAS R. THORN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES
DAHLIN, et al.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
THE THORN LAW FIRM
Dated: February 15, 2018
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
/s/ Serena M. Warner
By:_________________________________
SERENA M. WARNER
Attorneys for CITY DEFENDANTS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
1
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause having been shown, it is ordered
2
3
as follows:
4
1.
5
Complaint and to substitute the real parties in place of Doe 126 and Doe 127.
6
2.
7
Debby Nelson, Jon May, and Jennifer Solomon to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and the
8
amendments to be filed to the Complaint shall be extended to not later than 21 days after the
9
amendments to the Complaint are filed with the Court.
10
11
Plaintiffs shall have through and including March 9, 2018 to file an amendment to their
The time for Defendants City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Phillip Isetta,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2018
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?