Landeros et al v. Schafer et al
Filing
138
ORDER re Plaintiffs' Request to Issue Subpoena 135 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/2022: At the request of counsel for plaintiff, at the 10/31/2022 hearing on plaintiffs' motion for new trial, the parties may call any w itnesses and present any evidence they wish to present. The court does not understand that it is necessary for it to authorize the issuance of subpoenas for specific witnesses. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for an "Order Granting Plain tiffs' Request to Issue Subpoena to Dr. Jason Tovar" is denied as moot. Likewise, if defendants' attorney really wishes to call plaintiff's attorney to testify regarding his prior knowledge of Dr. Tovar's fees and other representations made in his declaration, nothing in this Order prevents him from doing so. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
JENNIFER LANDEROS, individually
and as successor in interest to
DANIEL LANDEROS, Deceased; DEJA
LANDEROS, individually and as
successor in interest to DANIEL
LANDEROS, Deceased; B.M.L.,
individually and as successor in
interest to DANIEL LANDEROS,
Deceased, by and through
JENNIFER LANDEROS, as Guardian
ad Litem; J.J.L., individually
and as successor in interest to
DANIEL LANDEROS, Deceased, by
and through JENNIFER LANDEROS,
as Guardian ad Litem; D.F.L.,
individually and as successor in
interest to DANIEL LANDEROS,
Deceased, by and through
JENNIFER LANDEROS, as Guardian
ad Litem; and T.D.L.,
individually and as successor in
interest to DANIEL LANDEROS,
Deceased, by and through
JENNIFER LANDEROS, as Guardian
ad Litem,
27
28
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
25
26
No. 2:17-cv-02598 WBS CKD
v.
SAMUEL SCHAFER; STEVEN HOLSTAD;
JUSTIN PARKER; PATRICK SCOTT;
JEREMY BANKS; and CITY OF ELK
1
1
GROVE,
2
Defendants.
3
----oo0oo----
4
5
At the request of counsel for plaintiff, at the October
6
31, 2022 hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for new trial, the parties
7
may call any witnesses and present any evidence they wish to
8
present.
9
it to authorize the issuance of subpoenas for specific witnesses.
The court does not understand that it is necessary for
10
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an “Order Granting
11
Plaintiffs’ Request to Issue Subpoena to Dr. Jason Tovar” is
12
denied as moot.
13
to call plaintiff’s attorney to testify regarding his prior
14
knowledge of Dr. Tovar’s fees and other representations made in
15
his declaration, nothing in this Order prevents him from doing
16
so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Likewise, if defendants’ attorney really wishes
Dated:
October 19, 2022
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?