Strawn v. Hatton
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 1/23/2020; and DENYING Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus; and Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (ECF No. 21 ).(Becknal, R)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JAMES EDWARD STRAWN,
5
6
7
No. 2: 17-cv-2599 JAM KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
S. HATTON,
8
Respondent.
9
10
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
11
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
12
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
13
On January 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
14
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
15
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
16
objections to the findings and recommendations.
17
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
18
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
19
ORDERED that:
20
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2020, are adopted in full;
21
2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and
22
3. Petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (ECF
23
No. 21) is denied.
24
25
26
27
DATED: March 24, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?