Strawn v. Hatton

Filing 25

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 1/23/2020; and DENYING Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus; and Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (ECF No. 21 ).(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAMES EDWARD STRAWN, 5 6 7 No. 2: 17-cv-2599 JAM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER S. HATTON, 8 Respondent. 9 10 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 11 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 12 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On January 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 14 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 15 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 16 objections to the findings and recommendations. 17 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 20 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2020, are adopted in full; 21 2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and 22 3. Petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (ECF 23 No. 21) is denied. 24 25 26 27 DATED: March 24, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?