Parham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/13/2018 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1 JAMES A. CLARK (BAR NO. 278372)

RENEE N. PARRAS (BAR NO. 283441)
2 TOWER LEGAL GROUP, P.C.

1510 J. Street, Suite 125
3 Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: [phone]
4 Fax: [phone]

Email:

[e-mail]

5 [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
STARR PARHAM
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
BALDWIN J. LEE (BAR NO. 187413)
ALEXANDER NESTOR (BAR NO. 202795)
ALLISON L. SHRALLOW (BAR NO. 272924)
Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4074
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

14 Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

19 STARR PARHAM,
Plaintiff,

20

Case No. 2:17-CV-002625-WBS-GGH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

vs.

21

22 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a Corporation;
and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1070757/SF

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, Plaintiff Starr Parham and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank,

1

2 National Association jointly stipulate that the Complaint and all claims against Defendant be
3 dismissed with prejudice, and each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
4
5 Dated: 2/21/18

TOWER LEGAL GROUP, P.C.

6
By: /s/ James A. Clark
JAMES A. CLARK
RENEE N. PARRAS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STARR PARHAM

7
8
9
10
11 Dated: 3/13/18

ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP

12
13

By: /s/ Alexander Nestor
BALDWIN J. LEE
ALEXANDER NESTOR
ALLISON L. SHRALLOW
Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER

20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint and all

21 of her claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association are dismissed with
22 prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
23
24 Dated: March 13, 2018
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1070757/SF

-2-