Monica McCarrick v. Espinoza

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/23/2019 GRANTING 35 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's reply to the answer is due on or before 10/22/2019. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONICA McCARRICK, 12 13 14 No. 2: 17-cv-2652 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER JANELLE ESPINOZA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s second 19 unopposed motion for a sixty days extension of time to file a reply to the answer. 20 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 35) is granted; 22 2. Petitioner’s reply to the answer is due on or before October 22, 2019. 23 Dated: August 23, 2019 24 25 26 Mccar2652.eot(3) 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?