Pharmaniaga Berhad v. E*Healthline.com, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/15/2018 GRANTING 24 Request to Modify Scheduling Order. ORDERING Page 2, Lines 14-16 of the 7 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order is amended and superseded only to the following extent: Because this is "an action to enforce an arbitration award," the parties are not required to hold a Rule 26(f) conference before serving discovery and are not required to meet and confer regarding a discovery plan. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Melanie M. Blunschi (SBN 234264)
[e-mail]
Patrick K. O’Brien (SBN 292470)
[e-mail]
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
R. Peter Durning, Jr. (SBN 277968)
[e-mail]
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Petitioner
Pharmaniaga Berhad

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

SACRAMENTO DIVISION
PHARMANIAGA BERHAD,
a Malaysian entity,
Petitioner,

17
18
19
20
21

v.
E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02672-MCE-EFB
The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.
Courtroom 7
ORDER GRANTING PHARMANIAGA
BERHAD’S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER

Respondent.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

ORDER GRANTING
PHARMANIAGA’S REQUEST TO AMEND
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

ORDER

1
2

The Court, having reviewed Petitioner Pharmaniaga Berhad’s Objection to Initial Pretrial

3

Scheduling Order and Request for Modified Discovery Schedule (“Request to Amend Pretrial

4

Scheduling Order”), submitted on February 6, 2018, and having received no objection from

5

Defendant EHealthline.com, Inc., hereby orders:

6
7

1.

Page 2, Lines 14-16 of the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7) is

amended and superseded only to the following extent:

8

Because this is “an action to enforce an arbitration award,” the parties are not required to

9

hold a Rule 26(f) conference before serving discovery and are not required to meet and confer

10
11
12

regarding a discovery plan. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(ix), 26(d)(1), 26(f)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2018

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

ORDE
PHARMANIAGA’S REQUES
PRETRIAL SCHEDU