Pharmaniaga Berhad v. E*Healthline.com, Inc.
Filing
78
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/14/2018 GRANTING 69 Motion for Attorney Fees and DENYING 56 Motion to Stay. Pharmaniaga is AWARDED attorney's fees and costs in the amount of 330,866.14 (pounds sterling) . (Huang, H) Modified on 11/15/2018 (Huang, H).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Melanie M. Blunschi (SBN 234264)
melanie.blunschi@lw.com
Patrick K. O’Brien (SBN 292470)
patrick.obrien@lw.com
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
R. Peter Durning, Jr. (SBN 277968)
peter.durning@lw.com
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 485-1234
Facsimile: (213) 891-8763
Attorneys for Petitioner
Pharmaniaga Berhad
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
PHARMANIAGA BERHAD, a Malaysian
entity,
Petitioner,
v.
E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Respondent.
22
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02672-MCE-EFB
The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.
Courtroom 7
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER
PHARMANIAGA BERHAD’S MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS AND
DENYING RESPONDENT
E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC.’S MOTION
FOR STAY
23
24
25
Good cause having been shown, and for the reasons stated in Petitioner Pharmaniaga
26
Berhad (“Pharmaniaga”)’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF No. 69), that Motion is
27
hereby GRANTED. Pharmaniaga is awarded attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of
28
£330,866.14.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1
2
3
4
Respondent has shown no basis for an order staying the judgment in this case, and, as
discussed in Petitioner’s Opposition, it’s Motion for a Stay (ECF No. 56) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?