Pharmaniaga Berhad v. E*Healthline.com, Inc.

Filing 78

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/14/2018 GRANTING 69 Motion for Attorney Fees and DENYING 56 Motion to Stay. Pharmaniaga is AWARDED attorney's fees and costs in the amount of 330,866.14 (pounds sterling) . (Huang, H) Modified on 11/15/2018 (Huang, H).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Melanie M. Blunschi (SBN 234264) melanie.blunschi@lw.com Patrick K. O’Brien (SBN 292470) patrick.obrien@lw.com 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 R. Peter Durning, Jr. (SBN 277968) peter.durning@lw.com 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 485-1234 Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 Attorneys for Petitioner Pharmaniaga Berhad 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 PHARMANIAGA BERHAD, a Malaysian entity, Petitioner, v. E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Respondent. 22 CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02672-MCE-EFB The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Courtroom 7 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER PHARMANIAGA BERHAD’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS AND DENYING RESPONDENT E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC.’S MOTION FOR STAY 23 24 25 Good cause having been shown, and for the reasons stated in Petitioner Pharmaniaga 26 Berhad (“Pharmaniaga”)’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF No. 69), that Motion is 27 hereby GRANTED. Pharmaniaga is awarded attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of 28 £330,866.14. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1 2 3 4 Respondent has shown no basis for an order staying the judgment in this case, and, as discussed in Petitioner’s Opposition, it’s Motion for a Stay (ECF No. 56) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 14, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?