Springfield v. Khalit et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/17/2019 ADOPTED in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations, and Plaintiff' claims alleging denial of access to the courts and violation of due process are DISMISSED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2675 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
M. KHALIT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
////
28
////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 14, 2018, are adopted in full; and
2
2. Plaintiff’s claims alleging denial of access to the courts and violation of due process
3
are dismissed.
4
5
6
7
DATED: May 17, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?