Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC v. Holiday et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/28/18 GRANTING Defendant's ex parte application to shorten time (ECF No. 42 ); RESETTING the Defendant's renewed motion to extend discovery (ECF No. 41 ) for October 4, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 25 before the undersigned; The parties may attend this hearing telephonically. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
SUSTAINABLE PAVEMENT
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
No. 2:17-cv-02687-WBS-KJN
ORDER
v.
RICH HOLIDAY, et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
Presently pending before the court is defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“Chase”)
20
renewed motion to extend discovery and ex parte application for an order shortening time. (ECF
21
Nos. 41 and 42.) Plaintiff has opposed the motion and application. (ECF No. 43.) The motion is
22
set for hearing on November 8, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., but defendant requests that the matter be
23
heard on October 4, 2018. (Id.)
24
The court previously denied Chase’s motion to extend discovery by sixty days because
25
Chase failed to demonstrate that doing so would not also change the trial date. (ECF No. 40.)
26
Chase renews its motion to extend discovery by thirty-two days, instead of sixty. (ECF No. 41.)
27
Because the current discovery deadline is September 28, 2018, and because the briefing on this
28
motion is apparently complete, good cause exists to hear this motion on shortened time.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Defendant’s ex parte application to shorten time (ECF No. 42) is granted.
3
2. Defendant’s renewed motion to extend discovery (ECF No. 41) is re-set for October 4,
4
2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 25 before the undersigned.
5
3. The parties may attend this hearing telephonically.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated: September 28, 2018
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?