Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC v. Holiday et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/9/2018 DENYING without prejudice 52 Request to Seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to its 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court may consider a request to seal exhibits containing only those pages specifically referenced in the Motion for Summary Judgment, or a request to redact specified portions of the documents identifying of non-litigants. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 SUSTAINABLE PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-02687-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER RE: REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS v. RICH HOLIDAY; RYAN (TIM) BONARI; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 17 Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) asks 20 21 this court to seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to their 22 Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 51.) A party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the 23 24 burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of public 25 access. 26 (9th Cir. 2006). 27 supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general 28 history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 The party must “articulate compelling reasons 1 1 such as the public interest in understanding the judicial 2 process.” 3 motion to seal, the court must balance the competing interests of 4 the public and the party seeking to keep the records secret. 5 at 1179. 6 Id. at 1178-79 (citation omitted). In ruling on a Id. Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E to defendant’s Motion for 7 Summary Judgment are business records associated with two Chase 8 bank accounts in the name of defendant Rich Holiday.1 9 is a copy of Chase’s check acceptance policy in force between Exhibit F 10 November 20, 2014 and September 7, 2017. 11 excerpts from the deposition of Jeffrey Wanic, and Exhibit H is a 12 document titled “Holiday Diverted Check Summary” produced by 13 plaintiff Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC. 14 Exhibit G contains Though it asks this court to seal thousands of pages of 15 documents, Chase devotes just two pages to rebutting the 16 presumption in favor of public access to judicial records. 17 supports its request primarily with general assertions about the 18 potential harm that the release of these documents could present 19 Chase or its clients. 20 not constitute “good cause” to rebut the presumption in favor of 21 public access. 22 It These vague and nonspecific concerns do See Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Chase’s request 23 to seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to its Motion for 24 Summary Judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without 25 prejudice. 26 27 28 The court may consider a request to seal exhibits One of the bank accounts is in the name of Richard W Holiday dba Sustainable Product Testing and the other appears to be a joint account in the names of Richard W. Holiday and a nonlitigant. 2 1 1 containing only those pages specifically referenced in the Motion 2 for Summary Judgment, or a request to redact specified portions 3 of the documents identifying of non-litigants. 4 Dated: November 9, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?