Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC v. Holiday et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/9/2018 DENYING without prejudice 52 Request to Seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to its 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court may consider a request to seal exhibits containing only those pages specifically referenced in the Motion for Summary Judgment, or a request to redact specified portions of the documents identifying of non-litigants. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
SUSTAINABLE PAVEMENT
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
13
14
15
16
No.
2:17-cv-02687-WBS-KJN
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: REQUEST TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS
v.
RICH HOLIDAY; RYAN (TIM) BONARI;
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; and
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
17
Defendants.
18
----oo0oo----
19
Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) asks
20
21
this court to seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to their
22
Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment.
(Docket No. 51.)
A party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the
23
24
burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of public
25
access.
26
(9th Cir. 2006).
27
supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general
28
history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure,
Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172
The party must “articulate compelling reasons
1
1
such as the public interest in understanding the judicial
2
process.”
3
motion to seal, the court must balance the competing interests of
4
the public and the party seeking to keep the records secret.
5
at 1179.
6
Id. at 1178-79 (citation omitted).
In ruling on a
Id.
Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E to defendant’s Motion for
7
Summary Judgment are business records associated with two Chase
8
bank accounts in the name of defendant Rich Holiday.1
9
is a copy of Chase’s check acceptance policy in force between
Exhibit F
10
November 20, 2014 and September 7, 2017.
11
excerpts from the deposition of Jeffrey Wanic, and Exhibit H is a
12
document titled “Holiday Diverted Check Summary” produced by
13
plaintiff Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC.
14
Exhibit G contains
Though it asks this court to seal thousands of pages of
15
documents, Chase devotes just two pages to rebutting the
16
presumption in favor of public access to judicial records.
17
supports its request primarily with general assertions about the
18
potential harm that the release of these documents could present
19
Chase or its clients.
20
not constitute “good cause” to rebut the presumption in favor of
21
public access.
22
It
These vague and nonspecific concerns do
See Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Chase’s request
23
to seal Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H to its Motion for
24
Summary Judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without
25
prejudice.
26
27
28
The court may consider a request to seal exhibits
One of the bank accounts is in the name of Richard W
Holiday dba Sustainable Product Testing and the other appears to
be a joint account in the names of Richard W. Holiday and a nonlitigant.
2
1
1
containing only those pages specifically referenced in the Motion
2
for Summary Judgment, or a request to redact specified portions
3
of the documents identifying of non-litigants.
4
Dated:
November 9, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?