Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC v. Holiday et al
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/15/19 ORDERING that by November 22, 2019, plaintiff's counsel to review plaintiff's submitted attorneys' fees and costs to ensure they are properly attributable to prosecuting the case against this particular defendant. If plaintiff finds that some entries are not properly attributable to this defendant, plaintiff's counsel is to resubmit his billing sheets and file a declaration with the court explaining how the fees plaintiff is claiming, which mention other defendants, are associated with defendant Rich Holiday. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SUSTAINABLE PAVEMENT
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-02687-WBS-KJN
RICH HOLIDAY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Presently pending before the court is plaintiff Sustainable Pavement Technologies, LLC’s
18
19
motion for attorneys’ fees and costs against defendant Rich Holiday. (ECF No. 84.) The court
20
previously granted plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and awarded plaintiff $914,181 in
21
damages. (ECF No. 80.) Plaintiff appeared through counsel at the hearing on its motion; no one
22
appeared for defendant.
Plaintiff appears to be entitled to attorneys’ fees pursuant to Cal. Pen. Code § 496(c).
23
24
However, “district courts have considerable discretion in determining attorney’s fees.” Corder v.
25
Gates, 947 F.2d 374, 380 (9th Cir. 1991). For example, a court may reduce fees which reflect an
26
attorney’s work prosecuting a case against a litigant no longer a party to the suit. See Cataphora
27
Inc. v. Parker, 848 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 1070 (N.D. Cal. 2012).
28
///
1
1
In light of this, as the record currently stands the court cannot ascertain how some of
2
plaintiff’s claimed fees are associated with this particular defendant, precluding substantial
3
review.
4
Accordingly, by November 22, 2019, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to:
5
1. Review plaintiff’s submitted attorneys’ fees and costs to ensure they are properly
6
attributable to prosecuting the case against this particular defendant. If plaintiff finds that some
7
entries are not properly attributable to this defendant, plaintiff’s counsel is to resubmit his billing
8
sheets; and
9
2. File a declaration with the court explaining how the fees plaintiff is claiming, which
10
mention other defendants, are associated with defendant Rich Holiday.
11
Dated: November 15, 2019
12
13
14
2687.sust
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?