Womack v. Baughman et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/2018 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit an affidavit to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff an ifp application. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY WOMACK, 12 No. 2:17-cv-2708 KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the 19 required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $50.00 administrative fee.1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 20 1915(a). Therefore, plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate 21 affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the required fees 22 totaling $400.00. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in 25 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or 26 27 28 1 If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $50.00 administrative fee. 1 1 the required fees in the amount of $400.00; plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result 2 in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In 4 Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 5 Dated: January 12, 2018 6 7 8 woma2708.3a(CDCR) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?