Butler v. Central Transport, LLC

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/2018. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Christian Keeney CA Bar No. 269533 christian.keeney@ogletree.com Alis M. Moon CA Bar No. 293897 alis.moon@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Park Tower, Fifteenth Floor 695 Town Center Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: 714.800.7900 Facsimile: 714.754.1298 Attorneys for Defendant Central Transport, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RANDALL BUTLER, Case No. 17-cv-02710-KJM-CMK 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES 15 CENTRAL TRANSPORT, LLC, 16 DOES 1 to 20, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Butler.2710.Stip.LL .k.docx JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES 1 Plaintiff Randall Butler (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Central Transport, LLC 2 (“Defendant”) (collectively referred to as “the parties”) hereby enter into the following 3 Stipulation regarding discovery disclosures: 4 WHEREAS, on May 3, 2018, Plaintiff indicated that intended to amend his 5 Complaint to bring class and/or collective action claims against Defendant; 6 WHEREAS, on May 10, 2018, the parties attended the Court’s Initial 7 Scheduling Conference; and, 8 WHEREAS, at the Initial Scheduling Conference, the parties agreed to engage 9 in certain discovery to allow Plaintiff to determine whether he intends to file a motion 10 to amend his pleadings to bring class and/or collective action claims against 11 Defendant. 12 WHEREAS, on May 25, 2018, the parties entered into a stipulation, where 13 Defendant agreed to provide responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests for 14 Production within 40 days of the Court’s approval of the Stipulation. 15 WHEREAS, the Court approved this Stipulation on June 6, 2018. 16 WHEREAS, the parties have revised the language of Plaintiff’s Request for 17 Production as stated below from “exempt” to “non-exempt.” 18 WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to provide, upon 19 the Court’s approval of this Stipulation, a two-week extension for Defendant to 20 provide this information in order to ensure that Defendant is able to provide complete 21 and full discovery responses. 22 WHEREAS, Defendant has requested a settlement demand from Plaintiff and 23 believes settlement discussions will be facilitated once Plaintiff has Defendant’s 24 complete and full discovery responses. 25 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and 26 between the parties, and respectfully requested that the Court approve the same: 27 28 Butler.2710.Stip.LL .k.docx 1. Defendant shall have a two-week extension to answer Plaintiff’s interrogatories and respond to Plaintiff’s request for production listed below: 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES 1 Interrogatory No. 1: 2 As to any location in any state where Defendant Central Transport, LLC 3 employs a terminal manager or any person in a similar position, please list the address 4 of each location and the number of such persons at each location. 5 Interrogatory No. 2: 6 Please state all facts upon which you base your claim that Plaintiff Randall 7 Butler was an employee exempt from the wage and hour laws of California. 8 Request for Production: 9 Please produce all writings upon which you base your denial that Plaintiff 10 Randall Butler was an employee non-exempt from the wage and hour laws of 11 California. 12 Nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver of any privilege. Defendant 13 shall provide a privilege log as to any information or document it declines to provide 14 based on privilege. 15 2. Upon receipt of the information from Defendant, Plaintiff shall have 40 16 days to inform the Court whether Plaintiff intends to amend his Complaint. If no 17 motion to amend is filed, the parties shall file a joint status report within the next 18 fourteen (14) days providing all the information called for by the Court’s standing 19 orders. 20 3. Other than the discovery described herein, all other discovery shall be 21 stayed until Plaintiff determines whether he will amend his Complaint. In the event 22 Plaintiff moves to amend his Complaint, the parties agree that discovery shall be 23 stayed until the Court determines whether Leave to Amend should be granted. 24 25 26 27 28 Butler.2710.Stip.LL .k.docx 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES 1 2 DATED: July 16, 2018 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL COGAN 3 4 By: /s/ Michael Cogan (as authorized on 7/16/18 Michael Cogan Attorneys for Plaintiff Randall Butler 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: July 16, 2018 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Alis M. Moon Christian Keeney Alis M. Moon Attorneys for Defendant Central Transport, LLC 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Butler.2710.Stip.LL .k.docx 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION made and entered into by, between, and among the parties to the above-entitled action, as outlined above, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: July 23, 2018. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Butler.2710.Stip.LL .k.docx 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?