Butler v. Central Transport, LLC
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/2018. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Christian Keeney CA Bar No. 269533
christian.keeney@ogletree.com
Alis M. Moon CA Bar No. 293897
alis.moon@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Park Tower, Fifteenth Floor
695 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: 714.800.7900
Facsimile: 714.754.1298
Attorneys for Defendant
Central Transport, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
RANDALL BUTLER,
Case No. 17-cv-02710-KJM-CMK
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY
DISCLOSURES
15
CENTRAL TRANSPORT, LLC,
16 DOES 1 to 20,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Butler.2710.Stip.LL
.k.docx
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
1
Plaintiff Randall Butler (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Central Transport, LLC
2
(“Defendant”) (collectively referred to as “the parties”) hereby enter into the following
3 Stipulation regarding discovery disclosures:
4
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2018, Plaintiff indicated that intended to amend his
5 Complaint to bring class and/or collective action claims against Defendant;
6
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2018, the parties attended the Court’s Initial
7 Scheduling Conference; and,
8
WHEREAS, at the Initial Scheduling Conference, the parties agreed to engage
9 in certain discovery to allow Plaintiff to determine whether he intends to file a motion
10
to amend his pleadings to bring class and/or collective action claims against
11
Defendant.
12
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2018, the parties entered into a stipulation, where
13
Defendant agreed to provide responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests for
14
Production within 40 days of the Court’s approval of the Stipulation.
15
WHEREAS, the Court approved this Stipulation on June 6, 2018.
16
WHEREAS, the parties have revised the language of Plaintiff’s Request for
17
Production as stated below from “exempt” to “non-exempt.”
18
WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to provide, upon
19
the Court’s approval of this Stipulation, a two-week extension for Defendant to
20
provide this information in order to ensure that Defendant is able to provide complete
21
and full discovery responses.
22
WHEREAS, Defendant has requested a settlement demand from Plaintiff and
23 believes settlement discussions will be facilitated once Plaintiff has Defendant’s
24 complete and full discovery responses.
25
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
26 between the parties, and respectfully requested that the Court approve the same:
27
28
Butler.2710.Stip.LL
.k.docx
1.
Defendant shall have a two-week extension to answer Plaintiff’s
interrogatories and respond to Plaintiff’s request for production listed below:
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
1
Interrogatory No. 1:
2
As to any location in any state where Defendant Central Transport, LLC
3
employs a terminal manager or any person in a similar position, please list the address
4
of each location and the number of such persons at each location.
5
Interrogatory No. 2:
6
Please state all facts upon which you base your claim that Plaintiff Randall
7
Butler was an employee exempt from the wage and hour laws of California.
8
Request for Production:
9
Please produce all writings upon which you base your denial that Plaintiff
10
Randall Butler was an employee non-exempt from the wage and hour laws of
11
California.
12
Nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver of any privilege. Defendant
13
shall provide a privilege log as to any information or document it declines to provide
14
based on privilege.
15
2.
Upon receipt of the information from Defendant, Plaintiff shall have 40
16
days to inform the Court whether Plaintiff intends to amend his Complaint. If no
17
motion to amend is filed, the parties shall file a joint status report within the next
18
fourteen (14) days providing all the information called for by the Court’s standing
19
orders.
20
3.
Other than the discovery described herein, all other discovery shall be
21
stayed until Plaintiff determines whether he will amend his Complaint. In the event
22
Plaintiff moves to amend his Complaint, the parties agree that discovery shall be
23
stayed until the Court determines whether Leave to Amend should be granted.
24
25
26
27
28
Butler.2710.Stip.LL
.k.docx
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
1
2
DATED: July 16, 2018
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL COGAN
3
4
By: /s/ Michael Cogan (as authorized on 7/16/18
Michael Cogan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Randall Butler
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATED: July 16, 2018
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
11
12
13
14
By: /s/ Alis M. Moon
Christian Keeney
Alis M. Moon
Attorneys for Defendant
Central Transport, LLC
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Butler.2710.Stip.LL
.k.docx
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION made and entered into by, between, and
among the parties to the above-entitled action, as outlined above,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 DATED: July 23, 2018.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Butler.2710.Stip.LL
.k.docx
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?