State of California v. Ingram El

Filing 4

ORDER adopting in full 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/2017. Defendant's 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. This action is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court and CASE CLOSED. (Certified copy of Order mailed to SAC County Superior Court) (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-mc-00083-TLN-DB PS

v.

ORDER

MICHAEL INGRAM EL,

15

Defendant.

16
Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to

17
18

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 10, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,

19
20

which were served on Defendant and which contained notice to Defendant that any objections to

21

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the

22

findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and Defendant has not filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 10, 2017 (ECF No. 3) are adopted in

3

full;

4

2. Defendant’s May 16, 2017 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied;

5

3. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court; and

6

4. This case is closed.

7
8

Dated: November 8, 2017

9
10
11
12

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2