Dynacom Industries, Inc. v. Mainline Automotive Equipment Pty. Ltd. t/a Mainline Dynalog Dynamometers, et al.
Filing
7
ORDER granting 1 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/22/17: Kert Miller shall produce the responsive discovery to the defendants within twenty-one days of the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DYNOCOM INDUSTRIES, INC.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-mc-0121 KJM DB
v.
ORDER
MAINLINE AUTOMOTIVE
EQUIPMENT PTY. LTD. t/a MAINLINE
DYNOLOG DYNAMOMETERS, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
This action came before the court on September 22, 2017, for hearing of defendants’
18
19
motion to compel. Attorney Andrew Graben appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendants.
20
Attorney Timothy Nelson appeared in person, also on behalf of the defendants. No appearance
21
was made by, or on behalf of, any plaintiff or third party Kert Miller.1
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the
22
23
reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ August 25, 2017 motion to compel (ECF No. 1) is granted; and
24
25
////
26
////
27
28
1
No opposition to defendants’ motion has been filed.
1
1
2. Kert Miller shall produce the responsive discovery to the defendants within twenty-one
2
days of the date of this order.
3
Dated: September 22, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\dynacom0121.oah.092217
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?