United States of America v. $42,906.72 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2249869062
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING time for filing a complaint signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/2/18. The parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 1/19/2018.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
4
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U. S. Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
5
Attorneys for the United States
2
3
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
2:17-MC-00157-TLN-KJN
14
$42,906.72 SEIZED FROM WELLS FARGO
BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 2249869062,
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR
FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN
INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE
15
Defendant.
16
17
It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants Gregorio
18 Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez (“claimants”), by and through their respective
19 counsel, as follows:
20
1.
On or about July 24, 2017, claimants filed claims in the administrative forfeiture
21 proceedings with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the $42,906.72 seized from
22 Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2249869062 (hereafter “defendant currency”), which was seized
23 on May 8, 2017.
24
2.
The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit
25 required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any
26 person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person
27 other than the claimants have filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the
28 administrative forfeiture proceeding.
29
30
1
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File
Complaint
3.
1
Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for
2 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant
3 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative
4 forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of
5 the parties. That deadline was October 20, 2017.
4.
6
By Stipulation and Order filed October 23, 2017, the parties stipulated to extend to
7 December 19, 2017, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for
8 forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds
9 are subject to forfeiture.
5.
10
As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further
11 extend to January 19, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for
12 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant
13 currency is subject to forfeiture.
6.
14
Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be
15 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment
16 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to January 19, 2018.
17 Dated:
12/13/2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
18
19
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
20
21
22
Dated:
12/13/2017
23
24
25
/s/ Yan Shrayberman
YAN SHRAYBERMAN
Attorney for claimants
Gregorio Ramirez Castillo and
Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez
(Authorized via phone)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated: January 2, 2018
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
29
30
2
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File
Complaint
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?