United States of America v. $42,906.72 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2249869062

Filing 4

STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING time for filing a complaint signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/2/18. The parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 1/19/2018.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 4 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U. S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 2:17-MC-00157-TLN-KJN 14 $42,906.72 SEIZED FROM WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 2249869062, STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE 15 Defendant. 16 17 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimants Gregorio 18 Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez (“claimants”), by and through their respective 19 counsel, as follows: 20 1. On or about July 24, 2017, claimants filed claims in the administrative forfeiture 21 proceedings with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the $42,906.72 seized from 22 Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2249869062 (hereafter “defendant currency”), which was seized 23 on May 8, 2017. 24 2. The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit 25 required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any 26 person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person 27 other than the claimants have filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the 28 administrative forfeiture proceeding. 29 30 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Complaint 3. 1 Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for 2 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 3 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative 4 forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of 5 the parties. That deadline was October 20, 2017. 4. 6 By Stipulation and Order filed October 23, 2017, the parties stipulated to extend to 7 December 19, 2017, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for 8 forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds 9 are subject to forfeiture. 5. 10 As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further 11 extend to January 19, 2018, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for 12 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 13 currency is subject to forfeiture. 6. 14 Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be 15 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 16 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to January 19, 2018. 17 Dated: 12/13/2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 18 19 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 20 21 22 Dated: 12/13/2017 23 24 25 /s/ Yan Shrayberman YAN SHRAYBERMAN Attorney for claimants Gregorio Ramirez Castillo and Jennifer Jannette Castillo-Ramirez (Authorized via phone) IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: January 2, 2018 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 29 30 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?