Kappes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/16/18 DIRECTING defendant to file a memorandum within 14 days of the date of this order addressing whether defendant has been served with process and whether defendant intends to defend this action and file the administrative record within 90 days. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GEORGE KAPPES, III,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-0002 JAM DB
v.
ORDER
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
On January 23, 2018, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
18
19
pauperis and ordered plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal the documents necessary for
20
service of process. (ECF No. 3.) On September 26, 2018, the undersigned issued findings and
21
recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to
22
prosecute stemming from plaintiff’s apparent failure to submit documents necessary for service of
23
process on the defendant to the United States Marshal. (Id. at 1.)
However, on October 17, 2018, defendant filed a consent to jurisdiction of United States
24
25
Magistrate form. (ECF No. 8.) In this regard, it appears plaintiff may have submitted the
26
documents necessary for service of process on the defendant, and that defendant may have been
27
served with process.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
2
order defendant shall file a memorandum addressing: (1) whether defendant has been served with
3
process; and (2) whether defendant intends to defend this action and file the administrative record
4
within 90 days.
5
Dated: November 16, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.soc sec\kappes0002.def.int.ord
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?