Kappes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/16/18 DIRECTING defendant to file a memorandum within 14 days of the date of this order addressing whether defendant has been served with process and whether defendant intends to defend this action and file the administrative record within 90 days. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE KAPPES, III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-0002 JAM DB v. ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 On January 23, 2018, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 18 19 pauperis and ordered plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal the documents necessary for 20 service of process. (ECF No. 3.) On September 26, 2018, the undersigned issued findings and 21 recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to 22 prosecute stemming from plaintiff’s apparent failure to submit documents necessary for service of 23 process on the defendant to the United States Marshal. (Id. at 1.) However, on October 17, 2018, defendant filed a consent to jurisdiction of United States 24 25 Magistrate form. (ECF No. 8.) In this regard, it appears plaintiff may have submitted the 26 documents necessary for service of process on the defendant, and that defendant may have been 27 served with process. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this 2 order defendant shall file a memorandum addressing: (1) whether defendant has been served with 3 process; and (2) whether defendant intends to defend this action and file the administrative record 4 within 90 days. 5 Dated: November 16, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\kappes0002.def.int.ord 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?