Kappes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 2/21/2020 (ECF No. 22 );DENYING Plaintiff's 7/22/2019 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19 ); GRANTING Defendant's 8/22/2019 cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20 ); AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security; and this case is closed.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE KAPPES, III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-0002 JAM DB PS v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636 18 19 and Local Rule 302(c)(15). 20 On February 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 23 recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the 24 findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2020 (ECF No. 22) are adopted 3 in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s July 22, 2019 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is denied 5 3. Defendant’s August 21, 2019 cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is 6 granted; 7 4. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; and 8 5. This case is closed. 9 10 11 12 DATED: March 24, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?