Kappes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 2/21/2020 (ECF No. 22 );DENYING Plaintiff's 7/22/2019 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19 ); GRANTING Defendant's 8/22/2019 cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20 ); AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security; and this case is closed.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GEORGE KAPPES, III,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-0002 JAM DB PS
v.
ORDER
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social
Security,
16
Defendant.
17
This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636
18
19
and Local Rule 302(c)(15).
20
On February 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and
23
recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the
24
findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2020 (ECF No. 22) are adopted
3
in full;
4
2. Plaintiff’s July 22, 2019 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is denied
5
3. Defendant’s August 21, 2019 cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is
6
granted;
7
4. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; and
8
5. This case is closed.
9
10
11
12
DATED: March 24, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?