Humes v. Sacramento County

Filing 17

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/11/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JON HUMES,

12
13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0015 KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

15

Defendant.

16
17

By order filed May 4, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18

file an amended complaint was granted. On June 5, 2018, plaintiff was granted an additional

19

twenty-one days in which to file an amended complaint. Twenty-one days from that date have

20

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.

22
23
24
25

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

3

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

4

(9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: July 11, 2018

6
7
/cw/hume0015.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2