Corral v. Warren et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/13/21 DENYING 58 Motion to appear remotely at trial to renewal after a trial date is set.. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL,

12

No. 2:18-cv-0024 TLN CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WARREN, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil

18

rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that he be permitted to appear

19

remotely at trial. A trial date has not yet been set in this matter and, in light of the ongoing

20

Covid-19 pandemic, it is not clear when trial will be set. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

21

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to appear remotely at trial (ECF No. 58) is denied without

22

prejudice to renewal after a trial date is set.

23

Dated: April 13, 2021

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1
corr0024.rem