Corral v. Warren et al

Filing 74

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/15/22 ADOPTING in full 71 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 70 defendants' request for dismissal. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL,

12

No. 2:18-cv-00024-TLN-CKD

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WARREN, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

18

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

19

Local Rule 302.

20

On October 4, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed

27

the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

28

the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2022, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

3

2. Defendants’ September 1, 2022 request for dismissal is GRANTED; and

4

3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

5

DATED: December 15, 2022

6
7
8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2