Tucker v. Warden

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/2019 GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to have up to and including 7/15/2019 in which to file an opposition to 32 Motion to Dismiss. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GREGORY ALLEN TUCKER,

12
13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0035 TLN KJN P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

GESTELO, Warden,

15

Respondent.

16
17

On May 28, 2018, petitioner filed a request for extension of time to file a traverse.

18

However, respondent filed a motion to dismiss on May 3, 2019. Therefore, petitioner’s request is

19

construed as a request for an extension of time to file an opposition to respondent’s pending

20

motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 33) is granted; and

22

2. Petitioner shall have up to and including July 15, 2019 in which to file an opposition to

23

respondent’s motion to dismiss. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to timely file an opposition to

24

the motion may result in an order granting the motion or in the dismissal of this action.

25

Dated: June 5, 2019

26
27
/tuck0035.111(2)

28