Reed v. Leatherman et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/9/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 26 motion to compel, without prejudice to renewal pursuant to the terms identified in the court's 6/14/2019 order. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PETER J. REED,

12
13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0038 KJM CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

D. LEATHERMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On June 14, 2019, the court denied a motion to compel brought by plaintiff concerning his

18

requests to produce 1, 3 and 11 without prejudice to renewal if this action survives defendants’

19

motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has renewed his motion to compel despite the fact that

20

defendants’ motion for summary judgment has not yet been resolved.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 5, 2019 motion to

22

compel (ECF No. 26) is denied without prejudice to renewal pursuant to the terms identified in

23

the court’s June 14, 2019 order.

24

Dated: August 9, 2019

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1
reed0038.mtc(2)