Mendez Jimenez v. University of California et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/14/18. Lead Case is 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN, Member Case 2:17-cv-01914 JAM KJN; MEMBER CASE CLOSED; All future filing to be made in Case 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 3/15/2018 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
1
4
Douglas L. Gordon #163992
Aida S. Macedo #294632
MILES SEARS & EANNI
2844 Fresno St.
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 486-5200
(559) 486-5240 – fax
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTY
OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-20,
Inclusive,
15
16
Case No.: 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN
Case No.: 2:17-CV-01914-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF
CASES 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN AND
2:17-CV-01914-JAM-KJN
1.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL
PURPOSES
Defendants.
LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ,
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; BOARD
OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA; UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER;
and DOES 1-20, Inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
Plaintiff LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ; Defendant UNITED STATES
26
OF AMERICA; Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Defendant UNIVERSITY OF
27
CALIFORNIA REGENTS by and through their respective counsel, hereby
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES
Page 1
1
stipulate and agree as follows, and request that this Court order as
2
follows:
3
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED THAT:
4
5
1.
Pursuant to FRCP 42(a) the above captioned matters involve
6
common questions of law and fact and consolidating the actions would
7
avoid unnecessary costs, delays, and advance the interests of
8
judicial economy;
9
2.
The above-captioned actions are hereby consolidated for
10
all purposes into one actions and will be referenced as Case
11
number: 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN.
12
Dated: March 14, 2018
13
MILES, SEARS & EANNI
/s/Aida S. Macedo
Aida S. Macedo
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
Dated: March 14, 2018
/s/Joseph B. Frueh
(As authorized on 03/13/2018)
Joseph B. Frueh
Attorneys for Defendant USA
17
18
19
20
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Dated: March 14, 2018
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
/s/Nicole M. Cahill
(As authorized on 03/13/2018)
Nicole M. Cahill
Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY
SACRAMENTO
21
22
23
OF
24
Dated: March 14, 2018
WILKE FLEURY HOFFELT GOULD & BIRNEY
25
26
27
28
/s/Neal Lutterman
(As authorized on 03/13/2018)
Neal Lutterman
Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA REGENTS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES
Page 2
ORDER
1
2
3
4
The above stipulation having been considered and good cause
appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: 3/14/2018
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
The Honorable John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?