Mendez Jimenez v. University of California et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/14/18. Lead Case is 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN, Member Case 2:17-cv-01914 JAM KJN; MEMBER CASE CLOSED; All future filing to be made in Case 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 3/15/2018 (Mena-Sanchez, L).

Download PDF
1 4 Douglas L. Gordon #163992 Aida S. Macedo #294632 MILES SEARS & EANNI 2844 Fresno St. Fresno, CA 93721 (559) 486-5200 (559) 486-5240 – fax 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-20, Inclusive, 15 16 Case No.: 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN Case No.: 2:17-CV-01914-JAM-KJN STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF CASES 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN AND 2:17-CV-01914-JAM-KJN 1. STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES Defendants. LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ, 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER; and DOES 1-20, Inclusive, Defendants. 24 25 Plaintiff LUIS ALBERTO MENDEZ JIMENEZ; Defendant UNITED STATES 26 OF AMERICA; Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Defendant UNIVERSITY OF 27 CALIFORNIA REGENTS by and through their respective counsel, hereby 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES Page 1 1 stipulate and agree as follows, and request that this Court order as 2 follows: 3 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED THAT: 4 5 1. Pursuant to FRCP 42(a) the above captioned matters involve 6 common questions of law and fact and consolidating the actions would 7 avoid unnecessary costs, delays, and advance the interests of 8 judicial economy; 9 2. The above-captioned actions are hereby consolidated for 10 all purposes into one actions and will be referenced as Case 11 number: 2:18-CV-00044-JAM-KJN. 12 Dated: March 14, 2018 13 MILES, SEARS & EANNI /s/Aida S. Macedo Aida S. Macedo Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 16 Dated: March 14, 2018 /s/Joseph B. Frueh (As authorized on 03/13/2018) Joseph B. Frueh Attorneys for Defendant USA 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE Dated: March 14, 2018 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP /s/Nicole M. Cahill (As authorized on 03/13/2018) Nicole M. Cahill Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY SACRAMENTO 21 22 23 OF 24 Dated: March 14, 2018 WILKE FLEURY HOFFELT GOULD & BIRNEY 25 26 27 28 /s/Neal Lutterman (As authorized on 03/13/2018) Neal Lutterman Attorneys for Defendant UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES Page 2 ORDER 1 2 3 4 The above stipulation having been considered and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 3/14/2018 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ The Honorable John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?