Bailey v. Enloe Medical Center

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/3/2019 ORDERING that Defendants may file a response to 35 Motion for Extension of Time on or before 10/17/2019. Thereafter, 35 Motion for Extension of Time will be submitted without hearing. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAN BAILEY, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-CV-0055-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action for wrongful 18 termination. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19 32). No opposition to the pending motion had been timely filed and the matter was submitted on 20 the briefs without oral argument pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c). 21 Plaintiff now seeks a 94-day extension of time to file a response to defendant’s motion (ECF No. 22 35). Defendants may file a response to plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time on or before 23 October 17, 2019. Thereafter, plaintiff’s motion will be submitted without hearing. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: October 3, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?