Bailey v. Enloe Medical Center

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/3/2019 ORDERING that Defendants may file a response to 35 Motion for Extension of Time on or before 10/17/2019. Thereafter, 35 Motion for Extension of Time will be submitted without hearing. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAN BAILEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-CV-0055-KJM-DMC
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action for wrongful

18

termination. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No.

19

32). No opposition to the pending motion had been timely filed and the matter was submitted on

20

the briefs without oral argument pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c).

21

Plaintiff now seeks a 94-day extension of time to file a response to defendant’s motion (ECF No.

22

35). Defendants may file a response to plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time on or before

23

October 17, 2019. Thereafter, plaintiff’s motion will be submitted without hearing.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: October 3, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1