Bailey v. Enloe Medical Center

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/18/2018 ORDERING that the Status/Scheduling Conference SET for 6/6/2018 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties, no later than 7 days before the conference, a status/scheduling report. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAN BAILEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-CV-0055-KJM-CMK vs. ORDER ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER, 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. A status/scheduling 18 conference is hereby set before the undersigned on June 6, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Redding, 19 California. 20 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. 22 Plaintiffs proceeding pro se must each appear at the status conference and are reminded that they 23 may not make appearances for other plaintiffs proceeding pro se. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 2. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties, 2 no later than seven (7) days before the conference, a status/scheduling report addressing the 3 following matters: 4 a. Service of process; 5 b. Possible joinder of additional parties; 6 c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings; 7 d. Jurisdiction and venue; 8 e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof; 9 f. The proposed discovery plan developed pursuant to Federal Rule of 10 Civil Procedure 26(f); 11 g. The potential for settlement and specific recommendations regarding 12 settlement procedures and timing, including whether a settlement conference should be 13 scheduled and if so when, and whether referral to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution 14 Program (see Local Rule 271) is appropriate in this case; 15 16 h. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and motion and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial; 17 18 I. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings; 19 20 j. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in bankruptcy; 21 k. Whether the counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to 22 this matter acting as settlement judge and waiving any disqualifications by virtue of her so acting, 23 or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before another judge; and 24 l. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition 25 of this matter. 26 /// 2 1 3. Plaintiff and defense counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to 2 notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition (see Local Rule 160). In 3 addition, the parties are cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to the granting 4 of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further 5 provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments 6 if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Finally, Local Rule 7 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition by the 8 Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the 9 Court.” 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: April 18, 2018 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?