Bailey v. Enloe Medical Center

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/14/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's 66 and 67 Motions for Extension. While plaintiff has requested additional time to 9/12/2020, to file an opposition to 62 Motion to Dismiss, the Court sua sponte GRANTS plaintiff an additional 15 days to 9/24/2020, to file an opposition. Defendant's reply is due by 10/1/2020. Absent a showing of exceptional circumstances, further extensions of time will not be granted. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAN BAILEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-CV-0055-KJM-DMC
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

18

Court are plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time. See ECF Nos. 66 and 67. Good cause

19

appearing therefor, plaintiff’s motions are granted. While plaintiff has requested additional time

20

to September 12, 2020, to file an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court sua

21

sponte grants plaintiff an additional 15 days to September 24, 2020, to file an opposition.

22

Defendant’s reply is due by October 1, 2020. Absent a showing of exceptional circumstances,

23

further extensions of time will not be granted.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: September 14, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1