Lorretz v. USA Law Enforcement et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DIANNA LEE WALLACH LORRETZ,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-63-MCE-EFB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
U.S.A. LAW ENFORCEMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
After this action was closed and judgment duly entered, see ECF Nos. 27, 28, plaintiff
18
filed multiple miscellaneous motions, ECF Nos. 31-34, which are largely unintelligible. The
19
court takes no action on plaintiff’s filing as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed
20
that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal
21
Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
22
So ordered.
23
Dated: February 22, 2018.
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?