Lorretz v. USA Law Enforcement et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIANNA LEE WALLACH LORRETZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-63-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER U.S.A. LAW ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 After this action was closed and judgment duly entered, see ECF Nos. 27, 28, plaintiff 18 filed multiple miscellaneous motions, ECF Nos. 31-34, which are largely unintelligible. The 19 court takes no action on plaintiff’s filing as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed 20 that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal 21 Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 22 So ordered. 23 Dated: February 22, 2018. 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?