Storz Management Company et al v. Carey et al

Filing 225

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/23/23 DIRECTING plaintiffs' counsel shall determine an appropriate proposed temporal limitation, within 14 days of the date of this order. After plaintiffs' counsel has determined a proposed temporal limitation, the parties shall meet and confer with 14 days thereafter. Within 7 days of the parties' meet and confer, the parties shall file a supplemental Joint Statement not to exceed 6 pages.(Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

STORZ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a
California Corporation, and STORZ
REALTY, INC.,
Plaintiffs,

13

ORDER

v.

14
15

No. 2:18-cv-0068 DAD DB

ANDREW CAREY, an individual, and
MARK WEINER, an individual,

16
Defendants.

17
18
19

This action came before the undersigned on March 17, 2023, for hearing of defendants’

20

motion to quash. (ECF No. 116.) Attorneys Christopher Bakes and Bryan Sugar appeared via

21

Zoom on behalf of the plaintiffs. Attorney Alex Kachmar appeared on behalf of the defendants.
At the hearing the undersigned expressed an intention to adopt plaintiffs’ revision to

22
23

defendants’ alternative request for relief, specifically that the documents at issue be produced to

24

defense counsel. Defense counsel would, thereafter, be allowed to review the responsive

25

documents to make confidentiality designations pursuant to the stipulated protective order

26

governing this action, and to redact for privacy or privilege, provided defendants produce a Rule

27

26 privilege log if applicable.

28

////
1

1

However, the undersigned expressed a concern that the subpoena, as currently phrased,

2

contained no temporal limitation with respect to the documents requested. In response, plaintiffs’

3

counsel offered to research the issue and propose a temporal limitation.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiffs’ counsel shall determine an

6

appropriate proposed temporal limitation;
2. After plaintiffs’ counsel has determined a proposed temporal limitation, the parties

7
8

shall meet and confer with fourteen days thereafter; and
3. Within seven days of the parties’ meet and confer, the parties shall file a supplemental

9
10

Joint Statement not to exceed 6 pages.1

11

Dated: March 23, 2023

12
13
14
15
16
17

DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\storz0068.oah.031723

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The purpose of the supplemental Joint Statement is solely to address the temporal limitation of
the subpoenaed documents. The parties are not to rehash arguments already found in the Joint
Statement re Discovery Disagreement.
2