Storz Management Company et al v. Carey et al
Filing
257
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/25/2023 CONTINUTING 246 Motion to Compel Hearing to 8/18/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Parties shall meet and confer in person, over Zoom, or telephonically by 8/4/2023, and the parties shall file either a withdrawal of the motion to compel or an updated Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement by 8/11/2023.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
STORZ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a
California Corporation, and STORZ
REALTY, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-0068 DJC DB
ORDER
v.
ANDREW CAREY, an individual, and
MARK WEINER, an individual,
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
On June 23, 2023, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 246.) The motion to
20
compel is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on July 28, 2023, pursuant to Local Rule
21
302(c)(1). (ECF No. 246.) In connection with the motion the parties filed a Joint Statement re
22
Discovery Disagreement pursuant to Local Rule 251. (ECF No. 250.) Review of the Joint
23
Statement finds that the parties have, yet again, engaged in unhelpful conduct in connection with
24
presenting their discovery dispute. See ECF No. 222 at 10: ECF No. 229 at 2; ECF No. 245.
25
In this regard, plaintiffs’ counsel asserts that they “tendered substantially the same Joint
26
Statement previously filed” to defense counsel and asked defense counsel to “meet and confer on
27
either July 11 or 12,” but defense counsel only agreed to meet and confer on July 14, 2023, the
28
date the Joint Statement was due for filing. (JS (ECF No. 250) at 2.) Defense counsel asserts that
1
1
plaintiffs provided their portion of the Joint Statement “at approximately 9:00pm on July 14,
2
2023, which was substantially revised from an earlier draft that the parties met and conferred
3
about on July 14, 2023.” (Id. at 9.) As a result, the Joint Statement “addresses issues that have
4
been withdrawn by Plaintiffs.” (Id. at 10.) The deficiencies in this process should require no
5
explanation.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1. The July 28, 2023 hearing of plaintiffs’ motion to compel (ECF No. 246) is continued
8
to August 18, 2023;
9
10
2. On or before August 4, 2023, the parties shall meet and confer either in person, over
Zoom, or telephonically; and
11
3. On or before August 11, 2023, the parties shall file either a withdrawal of the motion
12
to compel or an updated Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement.1
13
Dated: July 25, 2023
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\storz0068.mtc.cont.ord
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The parties shall ensure that the Joint Statement complies with the Local Rules and the
undersigned’s Standard Information, available at the court’s web page at
http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/all-judges/united-states-magistratejudge-deborah-barnes-db. Moreover, given the culpable conduct of both counsel, neither side
should anticipate being awarded any monetary compensation in connection with the further meet
and confer efforts or the drafting of the updated Joint Statement.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?