City of Lincoln v. County of Placer

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/4/23 ORDERING that the City may file its Opposition to the County's Motion to Amend on or before 1/9/23. The County may file its Reply to the City's Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or before 1/20/23. The hearing for 73 the Motion to File Amended Answer and 68 the Motion to Strike is RESET to 3/10/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)

Case 2:18-cv-00087-KJM-AC Document 75 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

KRISTINE L. MOLLENKOPF (SBN 185914)
[e-mail]
City of Lincoln, City Attorney’s Office
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Tel: [phone]
William D. Brown (SBN 125468)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey T. Orrell (SBN 237581)
[e-mail]
Janet Menacher (SBN 291365)
[e-mail]
Charles D. Grosenick (SBN 317715)
[e-mail]
Brown & Winters
2533 South Coast Highway, Suite 270
Cardiff-by-the-Sea, CA 92007-2133
Tel: [phone]/Fax: [phone]

12
13

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

CITY OF LINCOLN,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21

v.
COUNTY OF PLACER; and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,

22

Defendant,
_______________________________________

23

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Case No. 2:18-CV-00087-KJM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR
THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S
OPPOSITION TO THE COUNTY OF
PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND
ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF
PLACER’S REPLY
Date: January 27, 2023
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Courtroom: 3

24
25
26
27
28

00057581.1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO THE
COUNTY OF PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER’S REPLY

Case 2:18-cv-00087-KJM-AC Document 75 Filed 01/04/23 Page 2 of 4
1

By and through undersigned counsel, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Lincoln (“City”)

2

and Defendant/Counterclaimant County of Placer (“County”) (hereinafter collectively, “Parties”)

3

hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2022, the City served its First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 66)

4
5

on the County;
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2022, the County filed its answer to the First Amended

6
7

Complaint (Dkt. 67);
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2022, the City filed its Motion to Strike the County’s

8
9

Second Affirmative Defense within its Answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 68);
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2022, the County filed its Motion to Amend its Answer to

10
11

the First Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Amend”), concurrently herewith;
WHEREAS, per E. D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c), the City’s Opposition to the Motion to

12
13

Amend would otherwise be due no later than January 6, 2023;

14

WHEREAS, in recognition of the City’s agreement to an extension by two additional days

15

for filing the opposition to any motion to be filed by the City between the date hereof and January

16

1, 2023, and in recognition of the Christmas and New Year’s public holidays, the Parties stipulate

17

to the following extensions of time for filing the opposition and the reply to the County’s Motion

18

to Amend.
NOW THEREFORE, the Stipulating Parties hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 144,

19
20

to the following:
1. The City may file its Opposition to the County’s Motion to Amend on or before January 9,

21

2023.

22

2. The County may file its Reply to the City’s Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or

23

before January 20, 2023.

24
25

//

26

//

27

//

28
00057581.1

-1-

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO THE
COUNTY OF PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER’S REPLY

Case 2:18-cv-00087-KJM-AC Document 75 Filed 01/04/23 Page 3 of 4
1

Dated: December 23, 2022

BROWN & WINTERS

2
By: /s/Janet Menacher
WILLIAM D. BROWN
JEFFREY T. ORRELL
JANET MENACHER
CHARLES D. GROSENICK
RYAN D. DROBEK
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Dated: December 23, 2022

10

HARTMAN KING PC

By: /s/Alanna Lungren
JENNIFER HARTMAN KING
ALANNA LUNGREN
WILLIAM D. MARSH
J. R. PARKER
ANDREYA WOO NAZAL
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
COUNTY OF PLACER

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00057581.1

-2-

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO THE
COUNTY OF PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER’S REPLY

Case 2:18-cv-00087-KJM-AC Document 75 Filed 01/04/23 Page 4 of 4
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

CITY OF LINCOLN,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

Case No.: 2:18-CV-00087-KJM-AC
ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING
TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S
OPPOSITION TO COUNTY OF
PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND
ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF
PLACER’S REPLY

v.
COUNTY OF PLACER; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,

10

Defendants,
_____________________________________

11

AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

12
13

Upon consideration of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant City of Lincoln’s (“City”) and

14

Defendant/Counterclaimant County of Placer’s (“County”) Stipulation to Extend Time for City of

15

Lincoln to File Opposition to County of Placer’s Motion to Amend, and finding good cause

16

therefor, the Court orders:

17
18
19
20
21

1. The City may file its Opposition to the County’s Motion to Amend on or before January 9,
2023.
2. The County may file its Reply to the City’s Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or
before January 20, 2023.
3. In light of this new briefing schedule, the motion hearing for the two pending motions,

22

ECF Nos. 68 and 73, set for January 27, 2023 is reset for March 10, 2023.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: January 4, 2023.

25
26
27
28
00057581.1

-3-

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE FILING TIME FOR THE CITY OF LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO THE
COUNTY OF PLACER’S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER’S REPLY