Davis v. Rackley et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/26/2019 GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 90 days from the date this order is served to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBBIE DAVIS, 12 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0090-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. RACKLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests a 90-day extension of time to file an amended complaint in 19 accordance with the court’s February 4, 2019 screening order. 20 Plaintiff’s request (ECF No. 9) is granted and plaintiff has 90 days from the date this order 21 is served to file an amended complaint. The court notes that preparing an amended complaint 22 should not require extensive research. Nor should it require the inclusion of legal citations, 23 unnecessary exhibits, or overly detailed factual allegations. Thus, the court is not inclined to 24 grant further requests for extension of time, as this extension should afford plaintiff sufficient 25 time to prepare and file an amended complaint. 26 27 28 So ordered. DATED: February 26, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?