Davis v. Rackley et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/20/2023 DENYING plaintiff's 31 letter construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b). (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBBIE DAVIS,
12
13
No. 2:18-cv-00090-TLN-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
R. RACKLEY, Warden, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On March 26, 2020, the Court dismissed this action as barred by the statute of limitations
18
and the Clerk of the Court entered judgment. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.) Presently before the Court is
19
Plaintiff’s May 18, 2023 letter, requesting that the Court allow his case to move forward. (ECF
20
No. 31.) Plaintiff previously filed such a request, which the Court construed as a motion for
21
reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30.) That
22
motion was denied by order filed December 14, 2020. (ECF No. 30.) Like the prior motion, the
23
instant request is construed as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b). So construed, the
24
motion is hereby DENIED.
25
Rule 60(b) provides for reconsideration of a final judgment where one of more of the
26
following is shown: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly
27
discovered evidence which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered within
28
twenty-eight days of entry of judgment; (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct of an
1
1
opposing party; (4) voiding of the judgment; (5) satisfaction of the judgment; and (6) any other
2
reason justifying relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). In the instant motion, Plaintiff repeats arguments
3
previously raised and rejected by the Court and does not address or otherwise meet the Rule 60(b)
4
standards.
5
6
7
8
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s May 18, 2023 letter, construed as a motion for relief from
judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) (ECF No. 31), is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: June 20, 2023
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?