Deere v. Borders

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/22/2018 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTHUR RAY DEERE, Sr., 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:18-cv-0091 DB P ORDER BORDERS, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This 19 court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 Petitioner is incarcerated in California Institution for Men in San Bernardino County and 21 was convicted in Riverside County. Both San Bernardino and Riverside are in an area embraced 22 by the United States District Court for the Central of California. 23 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of 24 confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state 25 prisoners. Because petitioner was not convicted in this district, and is not presently confined 26 here, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application. 27 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis; and 1 1 2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of 2 California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 3 Dated: January 22, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DLB:9 DB/orders-habeas/deer0091.108b 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?